I recently stumbled upon this Independent Online (IOL) book review and was amazed at the conclusion. It reminded me of Romans 3:23! I have attached the link as well as including the body of the review here. I love the concluding sentence.
http://www.tonight.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=5262240
Sordid elements of the liberation struggle revealed November 26, 2009
Inside Quatro: Uncovering the exile history of the ANC and Swapo
by Paul Trewhela
Jacana R180
Review by James Mitchell
Heroic struggle for liberation, or just one load of thugs trying to displace another mob of thugs? Neither, of course, but wouldn’t it be so much simpler if we had clearly defined goodies and baddies?
Alas, real life’s not like that.
In a review (see below in this article) of the new biography of Chris Hani, Leon Marshall zeroes in on the “What if…?” factor. What if Hani had not been shot? What if Hani was alive today? What if Hani led South Africa? As Marshall writes, “intriguing scenarios” follow therefrom.
This author (who, by the way, writes like a gem): Paul Trewhela is, above all, a true believer.
He’s not like polemicist RW Johnson… a believer who converted to another faith; instead he seeks the ideal. Never mind that this ideal may have been as exploded as the belief in a flat earth; Trewhela’s still there, preaching the cause.
He was a member of the SA Communist Party, imprisoned from 1964 to 67, then exiled. (He also, poor chap, reported for The Star, but was dismissed in 1962.)
Trewhela left the party because it proved not to be what it claimed. In “The problem of communism in Southern Africa” he writes that this “problem… is in turn central to the dictatorship in Zimbabwe, the sordid farce of its electoral system, collusion with this dictatorship by the government of South Africa under President Thabo Mbeki and the humiliating spectacle of the leaders of the Southern African Development Community in a phalanx of agreement with President Robert Mugabe, their old and young grey heads as fixed and corpse-like as the Politburo of Soviet Communist Party lined up on Lenin’s tomb in Moscow in days of yore”.
Mbeki’s glad-handing of Mugabe was as blind and immoral, Trewhela suggests, as the manner in which another South African willingly served as an apologist for Stalin’s murderous collectivisation policy.
Trewhela describes how two young Rhodes scholars (Oxford 1931) travelled on a four-week Intourist journey to the Soviet Union in 1932. One, New Zealander Geoffrey Cox, saw and understood and described the “State-enforced famine in the Soviet Union (which) brought about the death of millions and gave a massive stimulus to the Gulag: the state-enforced system of slave labour and working to death, most horribly in the frozen goldfields at Kolyma in eastern Siberia, where millions of famine victims were deported under armed guard, to work and die”. The other – South African Bram Fisher – saw it as “the only method whereby a world communist existence could be brought into being”.
The end, in other words, justifies the means. As Trewhela sums up: “Advocacy of terroristic state behaviour has a long history in southern Africa.”
All but one of the essays and articles in this book come from Trewhela’s writing over half a century. The exception is the piece A miscarriage of democracy, by Bandile Ketelo, Amos Maxongo, Zamxolo Tshona, Ronnie Masango and Luvo Mbengo, describing the 1984 MK mutiny, its causes and aftermath, including the details of torture and public execution.
That was Hani’s time. In The ANC Prison Camps: An Audit of Three Years, Trewhela notes how Hani later presented a facade of openness, while doing his best to minimise the horrors of Quatro. At no point did he come clean. And yet, “the more the evidence is studied, the more it appears that Hani has adapted himself chameleon-like to every terrain”.
Can there be any doubt that, far from being the ascetic, principled leader of a new South Africa, Hani would have headed for the fleshpots in the same way as, say, the SACP’s Blade Nzimande? (Flashback: “In 1968 a batch of Umkhonto defectors… accused their commanders of extravagant living…”)
Alternatively, that he would have become “an impressive and indefatigable bureaucrat… genial, hardworking, ruthless, shrewd”. Oh, sorry, that’s from a description of Nikolai Yezhov, aka “the bloody dwarf”, who served as head of the NKVD and Stalin’s butcher. It comes from a book about Yezhov by J Arch Getty, a US professor, and NI Naumov, deputy chief of Moscow’s Communist Party archives.
The possibilities are endless. But reading Trewhela, you realise that corruption of soul and spirit is everywhere.
I don’t have this book, but would love to try get hold of it!